The Clinicians’ Skills, Capability, and Organisational Research Readiness (SCORR) Tool
A research-active healthcare workforce contributes to improved quality of care. Clinicians may be unaware that they are applying early research skills during their everyday practice. Greater understanding of their level of research attainment may improve their awareness and confidence in their research skills. This article describes the development of the Clinicians Skills, Capability, and Organisational Research Readiness (SCORR) Tool, a simple innovation that assesses and captures research skills and attainment at 1) clinician, and 2) organisational level. The SCORR Tool was initially developed to assess levels of research attainment and to promote discussion during annual appraisals for podiatrists working across secondary and community care in a northern region of England. The levels (1 to 5) of attainment recognise UK Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) registration requirements for chiropodists/podiatrists (Standards 12 to 14). Following testing and feedback, research levels were adapted (Levels 0 to 5) to accommodate all healthcare professionals (with the exception of doctors and dentists). The SCORR Tool may be used individually by clinicians, or in collaboration with their manager, to better understand the level of research attainment and to prompt discussion to increase research activity. It may also be used across a workforce (e.g. during an appraisal) to understand the organisational research readiness. The SCORR Tool requires additional testing and evaluation to validate it as a tool for use across a variety of organisational environments.
Boaz, A., Hanney, S., Jones, T., & Soper, B. (2015). Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: A three-stage review. BMJ Open, 5(12), e009415. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415
Carrick-Sen, D., Richardson, A., Moore, A., & Dolan, S. (2016). Transforming healthcare through clinical academic roles in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: A practical resource for healthcare provider organisations. https://councilofdeans.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/AUKUH-Transforming-Healthcare.pdf
Clarke, M., & Loudon, K. (2011). Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review. Trials, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-16
Department of Health. (2015). The NHS constitution for England. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480482/NHS_Constitution_WEB.pdf
Edwards, P. (2010). Questionnaires in clinical trials: Guidelines for optimal design and administration. Trials, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2
Health and Care Professions Council. (2013). Standards of proficiency: Chiropodists/podiatrists. https://www.hcpc-uk.org/globalassets/resources/standards/standards-of-proficiency---chiropodists-and-podiatrists.pdf
Health Education England. (2014). Developing a flexible workforce that embraces research and innovation: Research and Innovation Strategy. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/HEE%20research%20and%20innovation%20strategy.pdf
National Institute for Health Research. (2019). NIHR strategic review of training. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/explore-nihr/support/strategic-review-of-training.htm
Nursing & Midwifery Council. (2018). The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/nmc-publications/nmc-code.pdf
Watson, B., Clarke, C., Swallow, V., & Forster, S. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis of the research and development culture index among qualified nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(9), 1039–1164 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01214.x
Westwood, G., & Richardson, A. (2014). Clinical Academic Careers Pathway Capability Framework for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. AUKUH. https://www.southampton.ac.uk/assets/centresresearch/documents/wphs/AUKUH-Clinical-Academic-Careers-Capability-Framework-May-2014-4.pdf
Copyright (c) 2019 Heather Iles-Smith, Carole Burnette, Denise H Ross, Heidi J Siddle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License "Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivs 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits others to use the publication as long as the authors are appropriately cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Author grants to Coventry University an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive licence to publish this article in this journal in addition to the licence granted at paragraph 1 of this copyright notice.