Utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment for Occupational Therapy Level I Fieldwork

  • Nora Frigo Creighton University
  • Emiliy Hanneman Creighton University
  • Adrianne Kashale Creighton University
  • Margaret Sutton Creighton University
  • Erin Wright Creighton University
  • Vanessa D Jewell Creighton University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-6003
Keywords: clinical competence, fieldwork, occupational therapy, reflection, teaching

Abstract

This study examined the utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment (OCIA) among occupational therapy students and their perceptions of the use of an occupation-centered approach to design interventions during level I fieldwork. Twenty-five students completed training on the OCIA, used the tool on level 1 fieldwork, and then completed a post-test survey containing closed and open-ended questions. Content analysis was used to analyze open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze quantitative data. Overall, students (N = 25) found the OCIA to be a beneficial tool to utilize during fieldwork experiences to recognize and develop interventions from an occupation-centered approach. Currently the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework and models of practice are the primary tools available for student reflection for intervention design. The findings of this study supported the need for a reflection tool to aide in the development and implementation of occupation-centered reasoning during fieldwork experiences.

Author Biographies

Nora Frigo, Creighton University
Nora Frigo is a current occupational therapy doctorate student at Creighton University.
Emiliy Hanneman, Creighton University
Emily Hanneman is a current occupational therapy doctorate student at Creighton University.
Adrianne Kashale, Creighton University
Adrianne Kashale is a current occupational therapy doctorate student at Creighton University.
Margaret Sutton, Creighton University
Margaret Sutton is a current occupational therapy doctorate student at Creighton University.
Erin Wright, Creighton University
Erin Wright is a current occupational therapy doctorate student at Creighton University.
Vanessa D Jewell, Creighton University
Vanessa D. Jewell, PhD, OTR/L is Assistant Professor and Program Director of the Post-Professional Occupational Therapy Doctorate Program at Creighton University.

References

Aiken, F. E., Fourt, A. M., Cheng, I. K. S., & Polatajko, H. J. (2011). ‘The meaning gap in occupational therapy: Finding meaning in our own occupation’. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 78 (5), 294-302.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). ‘Occupational therapy practice framework’: Domain and process’. 3rd edn.

American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68 (Suppl. 1), S1-S48. Available from <http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006>

Ashby, S., & Chandler, B. (2010). ‘An exploratory study of the occupation-focused models included in occupational therapy professional education programmes’. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 73 (12), 616–624.

Author. (2017a)

Author. (2017b)

Author. (2016)

Bachman, S. (2016). ‘Evidence-based approach to treating lateral epicondylitis using the occupational adaptation model’. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 70 (2), 7002360010. Available from <http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.016972>

Colaianni, D. J., Provident, I., DiBartola, L. M., & Wheeler, S. (2015). ‘A phenomenology of occupation-based hand therapy’. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 62 (3), 177-186.

Colaianni, D., & Provident, I. (2010). ‘The benefits of and challenges to the use of occupation in hand therapy’. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 24 (2), 130-146.

Curtin, M., & Fossey, E. (2007). ‘Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapist’. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 54 (2), 88-94.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, mail and mixed-mode survey. 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Epstein, R., Siegel, D., & Silberman, J. (2008). ‘Self-monitoring in clinical practice’: A challenge for medical educators’. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 28 (1), 5-13.

Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Development of professional expertise. London: Cambridge University Press.

Fisher, A. G. (2013). ‘Occupation-centered, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different?’ Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 20 (3), 162-173.

Fitzpatrick, N., & Presnell, S. (2004). ‘Can occupational therapists be hand therapists?’ The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 67 (11), 508-510.

Forsyth, K., & Kviz, F. J. (2006). Survey research design. In G.

Kielhofner (Ed.), Research in Occupational Therapy: Methods of inquiry for enhancing practice (pp. 91-109). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

Gustafsson, L., & McKenna, K. (2010). ‘Is there a role for meaningful activity in stroke rehabilitation?’ Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 17 (2), 108-118.

Gutman, S. A., Mortera, M. H., Hinojosa, J., & Kramer, P. (2007). ‘Revision of the occupational therapy practice framework’. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 61 (1), 119-126.

Hodgetts, S., Hollis, V., Triska, O., Dennis, S., Madill, H., & Taylor, E. (2007). ‘Occupational therapy students’ and graduates’ satisfaction with professional education and preparedness for practice’. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 74 (3), 148-160.

Kielhofner, G. (1992). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.

McConnell, M. M., Regehr, G., Wood, T. J., & Eva, K. W. (2012). ‘Self-monitoring and its relationship to medical knowledge’. Advances in Health Sciences Education 17 (3), 311-323.

Rose, B. W., Kasch, M. C., Aaron, D. H., & Stegink-Jansen, C. W. (2011). ‘Does hand therapy literature incorporate the holistic view of health and function promoted by the World Health Organization?’ Journal of Hand Therapy 24 (2), 84-87.

Smart, A. (2006). ‘A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility’. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 18 (5), 377-382.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). ‘A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data’. American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2), 237-246.

Weinstein, E. C. (2013). ‘Three views of artful practice in psychosocial occupational therapy’. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 29 (4), 299-360.

Wong, S. R., & Fisher, G. (2015). ‘Comparing and using occupation-focused models’. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 29 (3), 297-315.

Published
2019-07-31
How to Cite
Frigo, N., Hanneman, E., Kashale, A., Sutton, M., Wright, E., & Jewell, V. D. (2019). Utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment for Occupational Therapy Level I Fieldwork. International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care, 7(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v7i1.510
Section
Research Articles