Utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment for Occupational Therapy Level I Fieldwork
This study examined the utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment (OCIA) among occupational therapy students and their perceptions of the use of an occupation-centered approach to design interventions during level I fieldwork. Twenty-five students completed training on the OCIA, used the tool on level 1 fieldwork, and then completed a post-test survey containing closed and open-ended questions. Content analysis was used to analyze open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze quantitative data. Overall, students (N = 25) found the OCIA to be a beneficial tool to utilize during fieldwork experiences to recognize and develop interventions from an occupation-centered approach. Currently the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework and models of practice are the primary tools available for student reflection for intervention design. The findings of this study supported the need for a reflection tool to aide in the development and implementation of occupation-centered reasoning during fieldwork experiences.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014) ‘Occupational therapy practice framework’: Domain and process’. 3rd edn. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68 (Suppl. 1), S1–S48. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006 [1 August 2017]
Anders Ericsson, K. (ed.) (2009) Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609817
Ashby, S. and Chandler, B. (2010) ‘An exploratory study of the occupation-focused models included in occupational therapy professional education programmes’. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73 (12), 616–624 https://doi.org/10.4276/030802210X12918167234325
Bachman, S. (2016) ‘Evidence-based approach to treating lateral epicondylitis using the occupational adaptation model’. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70 (2), 7002360010. Available from https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.016972
Colaianni, D., and Provident, I. (2010) ‘The benefits of and challenges to the use of occupation in hand therapy’. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24 (2), 130–146 https://doi.org/10.3109/07380570903349378
Colaianni, D., Provident, I., DiBartola, L.M., and Wheeler, S. (2015) ‘A phenomenology of occupation-based hand therapy’. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62 (3), 177–186 https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12192
Curtin, M., and Fossey, E. (2007) ‘Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists’. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54 (2), 88–94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00661.x
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., and Christian, L.M. (2014) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons
Epstein, R., Siegel, D., and Silberman, J. (2008) ‘Self-monitoring in clinical practice’: A challenge for medical educators’. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28 (1), 5–13 https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.149
Fisher, A.G. (2013) ‘Occupation-centered, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different?’ Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20 (3), 162–173 https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2012.754492
Fitzpatrick, N. and Presnell, S. (2004) ‘Can occupational therapists be hand therapists?’ The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67 (11), 508–510 https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260406701107
Forsyth, K. and Kviz, F.J. (2006) ‘Survey research design’. in Research in Occupational Therapy: Methods of Inquiry for Enhancing Practice. ed. by Kielhofner, G. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis, 91-109
Gustafsson, L. and McKenna, K. (2010) ‘Is there a role for meaningful activity in stroke rehabilitation?’ Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17 (2), 108–118 https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1702-108
Gutman, S.A., Mortera, M.H., Hinojosa, J., and Kramer, P. (2007) ‘Revision of the occupational therapy practice framework’. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (1), 119–126 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.1.119
Hodgetts, S., Hollis, V., Triska, O., Dennis, S., Madill, H., and Taylor, E. (2007) ‘Occupational therapy students’ and graduates’ satisfaction with professional education and preparedness for practice’. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74 (3), 148–160 https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740707400303
Jewell, V., Pickens, N.D., Hersch, G., and Jensen, G. (2016) ‘An exploration into occupation-centered practice in skilled nursing facilities.’ Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 34 (1), 43-56 https://doi.org//10.3109/02703181.2015.1114062
Jewell, V., Burkley, J., and Kaufman, T. (2017) Inter-rater Reliability of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment in Adult Physical Rehabilitation. Unpublished manuscript. Omaha, NE: Creighton University
Jewell, V. and Pickens, N. (2017) ‘Psychometric evaluation of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment’. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 37 (2), 82–88 https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216688619
Kielhofner, G. (1992) Conceptual Foundations of Occupational Therapy. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis
McConnell, M.M., Regehr, G., Wood, T.J., and Eva, K.W. (2012) ‘Self-monitoring and its relationship to medical knowledge’. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17 (3), 311–323 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9305-4
Rose, B.W., Kasch, M.C., Aaron, D.H., and Stegink-Jansen, C.W. (2011) ‘Does hand therapy literature incorporate the holistic view of health and function promoted by the World Health Organization?’ Journal of Hand Therapy, 24 (2), 84–88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2010.12.003
Smart, A. (2006) ‘A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility’. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18 (5), 377–382 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl034
Thomas, D.R. (2006) ‘A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data’. American Journal of Evaluation, 27 (2), 237–246 https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Weinstein, E.C. (2013) ‘Three views of artful practice in psychosocial occupational therapy’. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 29 (4), 299–360 https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2013.848395
Wong, S.R. and Fisher, G. (2015) ‘Comparing and using occupation-focused models’. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29 (3), 297–315 https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2015.1010130
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License "Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivs 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits others to use the publication as long as the authors are appropriately cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Author grants to Coventry University an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive licence to publish this article in this journal in addition to the licence granted at paragraph 1 of this copyright notice.