Preparing Health Profession Students for Practice in Complex Real World Settings: How Do Educators Respond to a Model of Capability?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v9i1.749Keywords:
capability, competency-based education, complexity, prepared for practiceAbstract
Undergraduate education often leaves future healthcare professionals insufficiently prepared for the complex and unpredictable workplace. Competency-based medical education (CBME) is widely utilised in health professions’ education, but a growing literature highlights its limitations. Capability is a complex concept which builds on competence, while embedding the integration and adaptation of knowledge, skills and personal qualities. While capability can prepare learners for uncertainty and complexity, the concept has been slow to progress within health professions’ education. We introduced the concept of capability to over 110 international health profession educators through six conference workshops, using a visual model to facilitate understanding. Participants’ post-workshop qualitative feedback was collated and thematically analysed. One hundred and thirty-three free text comments were received and four main themes identified: conceptualising capability, capability as curriculum goal, educating for capability, challenges to implementation. The need for capability resonated with participants, although most were unfamiliar with the concept prior to the workshop. The workshop enabled participants to recognise the limitations of CBME’s ‘tick box’ culture when preparing learners to address complexity. The model helped educators grasp the concept of capability and its potential value in health professions’ education. Participants were then able to identify challenges and suggest approaches for implementing capability in practice. Educating for capability is fundamental for preparing students successfully for the ‘real world’ of professional practice. Most participants agreed it should be the end goal of healthcare education curricula. Healthcare educators are likely, however, to need support to embrace this paradigm shift.
References
Baillie, C., Bowden, J. A., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2013). Threshold capabilities: Threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. Higher Education, 65, 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9540-5
Bates, J., Schrewe, B., Ellaway, R. H., Teunissen, P. W., & Watling, C. (2019). Embracing standardisation and contextualisation in medical education. Medical Education, 53(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13740
Bishop, S. (2006). Using analogy in science teaching as a bridge to students’ understanding of complex issues. In J. H.F. Meyer, & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. (pp. 182–194.). Routledge.
Bleakley, A., & Cleland, J. (2015). Sticking with messy realities: How ‘thinking with complexity’ can inform healthcare education research. In J. Cleland, & S. J. Durning (Eds.), Researching medical education (pp. 81-92). Wiley Online Books. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118838983.ch8
Castillo, J-M., Park, Y. S., Harris, I., Cheung, J. J. H., Sood, L., Clark, M. D., Kulasegaram, K., Brydges, R., Norman, G., & Woods, N. (2018). A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Medical Education, 52(6), 592-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13519
Caverzagie, K. J., Nousiainen, M. T., Ferguson, P. C., ten Cate, O., Ross, S., Harris, K. A., Busari, J., Bould, M. D., Bouchard, J., Iobst, W. F., Carraccio, C., Frank, J.R., & ICBME Collaborators. (2017). Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education. Medical Teacher, 39(6), 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315075
Durning, S. J., Lubarsky, S., Torre, D., Dory, V., & Holmboe, E. (2015). Considering “nonlinearity” across the continuum in medical education assessment: Supporting theory, practice, and future research directions. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 35(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21298
Eva, K. W., Bordage, G., Campbell, C., Galbraith, R., Ginsburg, S., Holmboe, E., & Regehr, G. (2016). Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(4), 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9653-6
Fraser, S. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Coping with complexity: educating for capability. British Medical Journal, 323(7316), 799–803. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799
Gardner, A., Hase, S., Gardner, G., Dunn, S. V., & Carryer, J. (2008). From competence to capability: a study of nurse practitioners in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046714
General Medical Council. (2015). Developing a model for generic professional capabilities: A public consultation. London. https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/Developing_a_framework_for_generic_professional_capabilities_form_English_writeable_final_distributed.pdf_61568131.pdf
General Medical Council. (2017). Developing a model for generic professional capabilities. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/generic-professional-capabilities-model--0817_pdf-70417127.pdf.
Ginsburg, S., McIlroy, J., Oulanova, O., Eva, K., & Regehr, G. (2010). Toward authentic clinical evaluation: pitfalls in the pursuit of competency. Academic Medicine, 85(5), 780–786. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d73fb6
Glass, J. (2014). Competency-based training is a model for incompetence. British Medical Journal, 348, g2909. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2909
Govaerts, M., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2013). Validity in work‐based assessment: expanding our horizons. Medical Education, 47(12), 1164–1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12289
Hanks, S., Coelho, C., & Coster, R. (2018). Prepared for practice and equipped for employment: what do dental foundation trainers think of their trainees? British Dental Journal, 225(6), 549–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.756
Hawkins, R. E., Welcher, C. M., Holmboe, E. S., Kirk, L. M., Norcini, J. J., Simons, K. B., & Skochelak, S. E. (2015). Implementation of competency‐based medical education: are we addressing the concerns and challenges? Medical Education, 49(11), 1086–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12831
Hay, D., Kinchin, I., & Lygo‐Baker, S. (2008). Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049251
Iedema, R. (2011). Creating safety by strengthening clinicians' capacity for reflexivity. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(Suppl 1), i83–i86. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046714
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Kalet, A., Chou, C. L., & Ellaway, R. H. (2017). To fail is human: remediating remediation in medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(6), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0385-6
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 49(3):373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65(9), S63–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
Monrouxe, L., Bullock, A., Cole, J., Gormley, G., Kaufhold, K., Kelly, N., Mattick, K., Rees, C., & Scheffler, G. (2014). How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? Final report from a programme of research commissioned by the General Medical Council, UK. GMC.
Monrouxe, L. V., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Healthcare professionalism: improving practice through reflections on workplace dilemmas. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119044475
Neve, H., Gilbert, K., & Lloyd, H. (2018). PBL as learning vehicle, threshold concept or capability?: audio-diary research in medical education. In M. Savin-Baden, & G. Tombs. Threshold concepts in problem-based learning (pp. 49–64). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375123_005
Neve, H., & Hanks, S. (2016). When I say......... capability. Medical Education, 50(6), 610–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12956
O'Connell, J., Gardner, G., & Coyer, F. (2014). Beyond competencies: using a capability framework in developing practice standards for advanced practice nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(12), 2728–2735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12475
Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In: J. Meyer J & R. Land, R (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). Routledge.
Pusic, M. V., Santen, S. A., Dekhtyar, M., Poncelet, A. N., Roberts, N. K., Wilson-Delfosse, A. L., & Cutrer, W. B. (2018). Learning to balance efficiency and innovation for optimal adaptive expertise. Medical Teacher, 40(8), 820–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1485887
Rees, C., & Richards, L. (2004). Outcomes-based education versus coping with complexity: should we be educating for capability? Medical Education, 38(11), 1203–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02039.x
Rethans, J-J., Norcini, J. J., Barón‐Maldonado, M., Blackmore, D., Jolly, B. C., LaDuca, T., Lew, S., Page, G. G., & Southgate, L. H. (2002). The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance. Medical Education, 36(10), 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01316.x
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Sandars, J., & Sarojini Hart, C. (2015). The capability approach for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 97. Medical Teacher, 37(6), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1013927
Schuwirth, L., & Van der Vleuten, C. (2011). Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical Teacher, 33(6): 478–485. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
Stephenson, J. (1998). The concept of capability and its importance in higher education. In J. Stephenson, & M. Yorke (Eds.), Capability and quality in higher education (pp. 1–13): Kogan Page.
Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
ten Cate, O., Graafmans, L., Posthumus, I., Welink, L., & van Dijk, M. (2018). The EPA-based Utrecht undergraduate clinical curriculum: Development and implementation. Medical Teacher, 40(5), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1435856
ten Cate, O., & Scheele, F. (2007). Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Academic Medicine, 82(6), 542–547. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31805559c7
Teunissen, P. W., Watling, C., Schrewe, B., Asgarova, S., Ellaway, R., Myers, K., Topps, M., Bates, J. (2021). Contextual Competence: how residents develop competent performance in new settings. Medical Education, Early View Feb 25. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14517
Wass, V., Van der Vleuten, C., Shatzer, J., & Jones, R. (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. The Lancet, 357(9260), 945–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5
Wheelahan, L. (2007). What kind of curriculum, pedagogy & qualifications do we need for an uncertain future? In M. Osborne, M. Houston, N. Toman (Eds.), The pedagogy of lifelong learning: understanding effective teaching and learning in diverse contexts (pp 143–153). Routledge.
Whitehead, B., & Holmes, D. (2011). Are newly qualified nurses prepared for practice? Nursing Times, 107(19-20), 20–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License "Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivs 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits others to use the publication as long as the authors are appropriately cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Author grants to Coventry University an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive licence to publish this article in this journal in addition to the licence granted at paragraph 1 of this copyright notice.
