Real-World Training for Real-World Benefits: Exploring the Impact of Practice-Based Service Evaluation Training
Service evaluation is a major part of delivering effective healthcare. It is important that the future workforce of clinical psychologists is equipped with the skills required to complete evaluations of the services that they deliver. This article investigated the extent to which practice-based Service Evaluation Projects (SEPs) completed by trainee clinical psychologists at the University of Leeds had an impact on the real-world services that commissioned them. Descriptive analysis was used to summarise the characteristics of SEPs completed over the past thirteen years and to explore feedback from semi-structured interviews held with a sample of commissioners. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes relating to the impact of SEPs. 230 SEPs have been completed in the past thirteen years. Interviews with 15 commissioners concerning 38 individual SEPs found that the majority had a positive impact (n = 33), most of which were able to bring about a change independently of other initiatives within the service (n = 20). Almost all would have been impossible without the opportunity for clinicians to commission SEPs via the university. Three key themes emerged in terms of impact: improving processes; improving knowledge; and improving resources. Practice-based service evaluations completed by trainee clinical psychologists can lead to a positive impact on real-world services. This suggests that providing training experiences ‘in the field’ is a helpful pedagogical strategy, adding value to services as well as trainee health professionals.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
Lester, S., & Costley, C. (2010). Work‐based learning at higher education level: value, practice and critique. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 561–575. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903216635
Berwick, D., (2013). A promise to learn – a commitment to act: Improving the safety of patients in England. London: Department of Health. [online] available from <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_Report.pdf> [11 October 2016]
Division of Clinical Psychology (2010). Clinical Psychology Leadership Development Framework. Leicester: British Psychological Society. [online] available from <http://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/Public files/DCP/cat-710.pdf> [11 October 2016]
Fairman, S., (2015). NHS Improving Quality Annual Report. Foreword. NHS Improving Quality. [online] available from <http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/media/2667115/annual-report-2014-15.pdf> [11 October 2016]
Global Health Workforce Alliance & World Health Organisation (2014). A Universal Truth – No Health Without a Workforce. Third Global Forum on Human Resources for Health Report. [online] available from <http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/hrhreport2013/en/> [11 October 2016]
Higgs, J., Barnett, R., Billett, S., Hutchings, M., & Trede, F. (Eds.). (2013). Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-94-6209-126-9
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (2011). Improvement Leaders’ Guide
Evaluating improvement: General improvement skills.
Partnership and Accreditation (2014). Standards for Doctoral Programmes in Clinical Psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society. [online] available from <http://www.nhsiq.nhs.uk/media/2594707/ilg_-_improvement_knowledge_and_skills.pdf> [11 October 2016]
SEP Manual (2016). Doctor of Clinical Psychology Programme, University of Leeds. [online] available from < http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/file/3926/sep_manual_2017-2018 > [7 May 2018]
The Health Foundation (2014). A Commitment to Act? [online] available from <http://www.health.org.uk/infographic-commitment-act> [27 January 2018]
Wenger-Trayner, B. and Wenger-Trayner, E. (2015) Introduction to Communities of Practice [online] available from < http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/>. [27 January 2018]
Copyright (c) 2019 Matthew James Price, Gary Latchford, Jan Hughes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License "Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivs 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits others to use the publication as long as the authors are appropriately cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Author grants to Coventry University an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive licence to publish this article in this journal in addition to the licence granted at paragraph 1 of this copyright notice.