‘The Early Exposure is Really Helpful’ – Students’ Views of Participating in Communication Skills Screening
Keywords:communications screening, Speech pathology, student communication skills, student voice
Students commence university with many hopes and dreams for their future and for most, these are realised. Health professional students must succeed in both their academic and clinical experiences. Excellent communication with their patients and colleagues on placement is necessary and particularly so for speech pathology students. This qualitative, descriptive study investigates how first- and final-year students view the screening of their communication skills in which they participate. The focus groups took place within the speech pathology department of a major Australian metropolitan university. Data were transcribed and analysed thematically. Three main themes arose: professional development, students’ cognitive and emotional responses, and the organisation of the screener. Both groups of students felt the screener was both an important part of their professional development and a way of identifying and supporting speech pathology students with communication difficulties. They valued the student-led nature of the process. Implications for the value of using a student-led communication screener to identify students with weaker communication skills early in their program and for the support of such students are discussed.
Ajjawi, R., Dracup, M., Zacharias, N., Bennett, S., & Boud, D. (2020). Persisting students’ explanations of and emotional responses to academic failure. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 185-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1664999
Almeda, M. V., Baker, R., & Corbett, A. (2017, 01/01). Help Avoidance: When Students Should Seek Help, and the Consequences of Failing to Do So. Teachers College Record, 117. https://www.tcrecord.org/library ID Number: 21775
Anderton, R. S. (2017). Identifying factors that contribute to academic success in first year allied health and science degrees at an Australian university. Australian Journal of Education, 61(2), 184-199.
Ashenafi, M. M. (2017, 2017/02/17). Peer-assessment in higher education – twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 226-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711
Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence. Macmillan.
Chan, A., Purcell, A., & Power, E. (2016, Sep). A systematic review of assessment and intervention strategies for effective clinical communication in culturally and linguistically diverse students. Medical Education, 50(9), 898-911. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13117
Christensen, M. K., Henriksen, J., Thomsen, K. R., Lund, O., & Mørcke, A. M. (2017). Positioning health professional identity: on-campus training and work-based learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-01-2017-0004
Cleland, J., Arnold, R., & Chesser, A. (2005). Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Medical teacher, 27(6), 504-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500156269
Davenport, R., Hewat, S., Ferguson, A., McAllister, S., & Lincoln, M. (2018). Struggle and failure on clinical placement: a critical narrative review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(2), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12356
Dowling, S. (1985). Clinical Performance Characteristics Failing, Average and Outstanding Clinicians. The Clinical Supervisor, 3(3), 49-54. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1300/J001v03n03_05
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000, 2000/09/01). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287
Godsey, S. R. (2011). Student perceptions of professional identity and cultural competence The University of Minnesota]. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/107813
Goldbart, J., Marshall, J., & Evans, I. (2005). International students of speech and language therapy in the UK: Choices about where to study and whether to return. Higher education, 50(1), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6350-4
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001, 2001/05/01). Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776
Jensen, D. H., & Jetten, J. (2018). Exploring interpersonal recognition as a facilitator of students’ academic and professional identity formation in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(2), 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1374195
Johnson, R., Purcell, A., & Power, E. (2013, July 2013). Developing speech pathology clinical competency: are there predictors for success? [Peer Reviewed]. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 60-64. https://cld.bz/bookdata/hZaTwMp/basic-html/page-10.html
Johnson, R., Purcell, A., Power, E., & Cumming, S. (2021): A scoping review of predictors of speech-language pathology student success, Speech, Language and Hearing, DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1899572
Johnson, R., Purcell, A., Power, E., & Thomson, K. (2019). University teachers’ perceptions of screening students’ communication skills: A case study from speech pathology. International Journal of Practice-based Learning in Health and Social Care, 7(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v7i1.509
Johnson, R., Purcell, A., Power, E., & Cumming, S. (2021a). Predictors of failure to reach entry-level competence in Australian speech-language pathology students: a cohort study. [Unpublished manuscript]. Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney.
Johnson, R., Purcell, A., Power, E., & Cumming, S. (2021b). Predictors of mid-curricular clinical competence development in speech pathology students. [Unpublished manuscript]. Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney.
Kahu, E. R., Nelson, K., & Picton, C. (2016). “I’m excited!” Student expectations prior to starting their first year at university. In the proceedings of the STARS: Students Transitions Achievement Retention & Success Conference, Perth, Australia. https://unistars.org/papers/STARS2016/10A.pdf
Lincoln, M. A., & McAllister, L. L. (1993). Peer learning in clinical education. Medical teacher, 15(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599309029007
Lo, K., Curtis, H., Keating, J. L., & Bearman, M. (2017). Physiotherapy clinical educators’ perceptions of student fitness to practise. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0847-2
Lugassy, D., Levanon, Y., Pilo, R., Shelly, A., Rosen, G., Meirowitz, A., & Brosh, T. (2018). Predicting the clinical performance of dental students with a manual dexterity test. PLoS One, 13(3), e0193980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193980
McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013, 2013/06/01). ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher education, 65(6), 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z
QSR International. (2018). NVivo qualitative data analysis software. In (Version 12) QSR International Pty Ltd. . https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/home
Quail, M., Brundage, S. B., Spitalnick, J., Allen, P. J., & Beilby, J. (2016). Student self-reported communication skills, knowledge and confidence across standardised patient, virtual and traditional clinical learning environments. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0577-5
Shapiro, D. A., Ogletree, B. T., & Brotherton, W. D. (2002, Sep-Oct). Graduate students with marginal abilities in communication sciences and disorders: Prevalence, profiles, and solutions. Journal of communication disorders, 35(5), 421-451. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(02)00093-X
Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, 1-19.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007, Dec). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Vickerman, P. (2009, 2009/04/01). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955986
Wolden, M., Hill, B., & Voorhees, S. (2020, January 2020). Predicting Success for Student Physical Therapists on the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Physical therapy, 100(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz145
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License "Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivs 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits others to use the publication as long as the authors are appropriately cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Author grants to Coventry University an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive licence to publish this article in this journal in addition to the licence granted at paragraph 1 of this copyright notice.