Does an Online Clinical Educator Preparation and Support Program Change Practice?
Preparation of clinicians to act as student placement supervisors is important to ensure quality student placements for the development of the skills needed for competent performance in the workplace. Clinical educator preparation programs are offered in many formats, but these programs are rarely evaluated for impact on practice. In this article, we describe the results of the evaluation of an online clinical educator preparation and support (CEPS) program. Thirty allied health professionals, across a range of professions, responded to a survey regarding their experience of the program, usage patterns and their application of learning to practice. As a result of participation in the program, there was a significant increase in confidence levels in a number of topic areas covered in the program, and a quarter of respondents had changed their student supervision practices as a result of participation. Due to a low response rate at the three month follow-up survey, planned interviews to explore the impact of change in practice on the student placement experience could not be completed. While the study was not able to measure the impact of the CEPS program on placement quality, it did show that the CEPS program is able to significantly increase supervisor confidence in a number of areas, and is able to effect change in practice.
Breckwoldt, J., Svensson, J., Lingemann, C., and Gruber, H. (2014) ‘Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study’. BMC Medical Education, 14 (6) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-6
Dalton, L., Bull, R., Taylor, S., Galbraith, K., Marriott, J., and Howarth, H. (2007) ‘Evaluation of the national pharmacy preceptor education program’. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 15, 159–165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00878.x
Dettlaff, A. (2008) ‘Enhancing field instruction in child welfare: Evaluation of a training program to promote quality field instruction’. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 2 (3), 317–338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548730802463553
Hall, M., McFarlane, L., and Mulholland, S. (2012) ‘Positive clinical placements: perspectives of students and clinical educators in rehabilitation medicine’. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 19 (10), 549–556 http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.10.549
Hall, M., Poth, C., Manns, P., and Beaupre, L. (2015) ‘To supervise or not to supervise a physical therapy student: A national survey of Canadian physical therapists’. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 29 (3), 58–67
Health Education and Training Institute (2015) Clinical supervision training series: Evaluation report. [online] available from http://www.heti.nsw.gov.au/PageFiles/26152/Evaluation%20Report%20CSTS_Website_with%20Appendices.pdf [14 June 2016]
Health Workforce Australia. (2011) Clinical Supervision Support Program - Directions Paper, April 2011. [online] available from http://www.qrtn.com.au/images/pdf/Resources/Clinical%20Supervision%20Support%20Program%20Directions%20Paper-201104.pdf [16 September 2016]
Higgs, J. and McAllister, L. (2007) ‘Educating clinical educators: Using a model of the experience of being a clinical educator’. Medical Teacher, 29 (2-3), e51–e57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590601046088
Jippes, E., Steinert, Y., Pols, J., Achterkamp, M., van Engelen, J., and Brand, P. (2013) ‘How do social networks and faculty development courses affect clinical supervisors' adoption of a medical education innovation? An exploratory study’. Academic Medicine, 88 (3), 398–404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280d9db
Kanno, H. and Koeske, G.F. (2010) ‘MSW students’ satisfaction with their field placements: The role of preparedness and supervision quality’. Journal of Social Work Education, 46 (1), 23–38 http://dx.doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200800066
MacEachron, A.E., Gustavsson, N., Lavitt, M., and Bartle, E. (2009) ‘Supervisor preferences for the design and delivery of training’. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3 (2), 173–189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548730902855088
McBride, L., Fitzgerald, C., Morrison, L., and Hulcombe, J. (2015) ‘Pre-entry student clinical placement demand: Can it be met?’ Australian Health Review,39 (5), 577–81 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AH14156
Nisbet, G. and McAllister, L. (2015) ‘A critical review of outcomes of peer group mentoring and elements influencing its success and application to student placement supervisors’. International Journal of Practice-based Learning in Health and Social Care, 3 (2), 61–76 http://dx.doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v3i2.195
O'Brien, M., Phillips, B., and Hubbard, W. (2010) ‘Enhancing the quality of undergraduate allied health clinical education: A multidisciplinary approach in a regional/rural health service’. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 12 (1), 11–22
Recker-Hughes, C., Wetherbee, E., Buccieri, K., FitzpatrickTimmerberg, J., and Stolfi, A. (2014) ‘Essential characteristics of quality clinical education experiences: Standards to facilitate student learning’. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 28 (Supplement 1), 48–55
Rodger, S., Webb. G., Devitt. L., Gilbert, J., Wrightson, P., and McMeeken, J. (2008) ‘Clinical education and practice placements in the allied health professions: An international perspective’. Journal of Allied Health, 37 (1), 53–62.
Tai, J., Bearman, M., Edouard, V., Kent, F., Nestel, D., and Molloy, E. (2015) ‘Clinical supervision training across contexts’. The Clinical Teacher, 13, 262–266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tct.12432
Young, G., O’Callaghan, K., Hollands, K., and Healy, R. (2011) Summary report: Output evaluation of the Clinical Education Workload Management Initiative. Brisbane: Clinical Education and Training Queensland. [online] available from https://www.health.qld.gov.au/ahwac/html/publications.asp [14 June 2016]
Copyright (c) 2016 Laura Morrison, Liza-Jane McBride, Lindy McAllister
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License "Attribution-NonCommercial No Derivs 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) which permits others to use the publication as long as the authors are appropriately cited.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Author grants to Coventry University an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive licence to publish this article in this journal in addition to the licence granted at paragraph 1 of this copyright notice.